China vs Zimbabwe: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square

China
1.07 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.06 t per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
47th
Zimbabwe rank
48th

Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square over time

  • China
  • Zimbabwe
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 1.07 t per square kilometre against 1.06 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.01 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China ahead.

China ranks 47th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 124 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2184 t per square kilometre 0.4255 t per square kilometre 0.2071 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0.2995 t per square kilometre 0.7294 t per square kilometre 0.4298 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.5644 t per square kilometre 1.13 t per square kilometre 0.5699 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.8585 t per square kilometre 1.04 t per square kilometre 0.1857 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 1.21 t per square kilometre 1.14 t per square kilometre 0.0692 t per square kilometre China
2010s 1.29 t per square kilometre 1.12 t per square kilometre 0.1653 t per square kilometre China
2020s 1.05 t per square kilometre 1.05 t per square kilometre 0.003 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per square, China or Zimbabwe?
China, at 1.07 t per square kilometre against 1.06 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per square between China and Zimbabwe?
0.01 t per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Zimbabwe rank globally for raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per square?
China ranks 47th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Zimbabwe: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-cane-or-beet-sugar-centrifugal-only-production-per-square-kilometre/china/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-cane-or-beet-sugar-centrifugal-only-production-per-square-kilometre/china/zimbabwe/">China vs Zimbabwe: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
125 places, 6,773 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.