Australia vs Rwanda: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square

Australia
0.5445 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0.4659 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
62nd
Rwanda rank
64th

Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square over time

  • Australia
  • Rwanda
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.5445 t per square kilometre against 0.4659 t per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0786 t per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 62nd and Rwanda ranks 64th of 124 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.271 t per square kilometre 0.0017 t per square kilometre 0.2693 t per square kilometre Australia
1970s 0.3758 t per square kilometre 0.0468 t per square kilometre 0.329 t per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0.451 t per square kilometre 0.1174 t per square kilometre 0.3336 t per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0.5792 t per square kilometre 0.089 t per square kilometre 0.4902 t per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.6479 t per square kilometre 0.3736 t per square kilometre 0.2742 t per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.5767 t per square kilometre 0.3806 t per square kilometre 0.1961 t per square kilometre Australia
2020s 0.5502 t per square kilometre 0.4401 t per square kilometre 0.1101 t per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per square, Australia or Rwanda?
Australia, at 0.5445 t per square kilometre against 0.4659 t per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per square between Australia and Rwanda?
0.0786 t per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Rwanda rank globally for raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per square?
Australia ranks 62nd and Rwanda ranks 64th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Rwanda: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-cane-or-beet-sugar-centrifugal-only-production-per-square-kilometre/australia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-cane-or-beet-sugar-centrifugal-only-production-per-square-kilometre/australia/rwanda/">Australia vs Rwanda: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
125 places, 6,773 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.