India vs Latvia: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per capita
India
0.0257 t per person
in 2023
Latvia
0.0293 t per person
in 2006
India rank
38th
Latvia rank
35th
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per capita over time
- India
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0293 t per person against 0.0257 t per person in India, a difference of 0.0036 t per person.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times India's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1992 it was India ahead.
India ranks 38th and Latvia ranks 35th of 124 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0155 t per person | 0.0169 t per person | 0.0013 t per person | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.0172 t per person | 0.0315 t per person | 0.0143 t per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per capita, India or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.0293 t per person against 0.0257 t per person in India as of 2006.
- What is the difference in raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per capita between India and Latvia?
- 0.0036 t per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Latvia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2006.
- How do India and Latvia rank globally for raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per capita?
- India ranks 38th and Latvia ranks 35th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.