Georgia vs Slovenia: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per capita
Georgia
0 t per person
in 2009
Slovenia
0 t per person
in 2018
Georgia rank
111th
Slovenia rank
111th
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per capita over time
- Georgia
- Slovenia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Slovenia, a difference of 0 t per person.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 111th and Slovenia ranks 111th of 124 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0005 t per person | 0.0267 t per person | 0.0262 t per person | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 0.0003 t per person | 0.0206 t per person | 0.0203 t per person | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per capita, Georgia or Slovenia?
- Georgia, at 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Slovenia as of 2009.
- What is the difference in raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per capita between Georgia and Slovenia?
- 0 t per person, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Slovenia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2009.
- How do Georgia and Slovenia rank globally for raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per capita?
- Georgia ranks 111th and Slovenia ranks 111th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.