Cuba vs Latvia: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per capita
Cuba
0.0271 t per person
in 2023
Latvia
0.0293 t per person
in 2006
Cuba rank
37th
Latvia rank
35th
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per capita over time
- Cuba
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0293 t per person against 0.0271 t per person in Cuba, a difference of 0.0022 t per person.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 37th and Latvia ranks 35th of 124 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.396 t per person | 0.0169 t per person | 0.3791 t per person | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0.2337 t per person | 0.0315 t per person | 0.2022 t per person | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per capita, Cuba or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.0293 t per person against 0.0271 t per person in Cuba as of 2006.
- What is the difference in raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per capita between Cuba and Latvia?
- 0.0022 t per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Latvia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2006.
- How do Cuba and Latvia rank globally for raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per capita?
- Cuba ranks 37th and Latvia ranks 35th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.