Belarus vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Rape or colza seed — Gross Production Value

Belarus
366,291 1000 USD
in 2024
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
417,376 1000 USD
in 2024
Belarus rank
16th
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
13th

Rape or colza seed — Gross Production Value over time

  • Belarus
  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k199120072024

How they compare

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 417,376 1000 USD against 366,291 1000 USD in Belarus, a difference of 51,085 1000 USD.

That makes Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.

Belarus ranks 16th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 13th of 57 countries.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 8,252 1000 USD 191,320 1000 USD 183,068 1000 USD Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2000s 46,209 1000 USD 155,707 1000 USD 109,497 1000 USD Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2010s 178,428 1000 USD 274,904 1000 USD 96,476 1000 USD Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2020s 359,929 1000 USD 391,379 1000 USD 31,450 1000 USD Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rape or colza seed — gross production value, Belarus or Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 417,376 1000 USD against 366,291 1000 USD in Belarus as of 2024.
What is the difference in rape or colza seed — gross production value between Belarus and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
51,085 1000 USD, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank globally for rape or colza seed — gross production value?
Belarus ranks 16th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 13th of 57 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rape or colza seed — Gross Production Value (current thousand US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Rape or colza seed — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-or-colza-seed-gross-production-value-current-thousand-us/belarus/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-or-colza-seed-gross-production-value-current-thousand-us/belarus/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/">Belarus vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Rape or colza seed — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rape or colza seed — Gross Production Value (current thousand US$)
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
85 places, 2,705 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.