Central America vs Latvia: Rape or colza seed — Gross Production Index Number
Central America
35.29
in 2024
Latvia
128.48
in 2017
Central America rank
24th
Latvia rank
21st
Rape or colza seed — Gross Production Index Number over time
- Central America
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 128.48 against 35.29 in Central America, a difference of 93.19.
That makes Latvia's figure about 3.6 times Central America's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Central America ahead.
Central America ranks 24th and Latvia ranks 21st of 24 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Central America averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central America | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 24.82 | 1.07 | 23.75 | Central America |
| 2000s | 77.65 | 41.87 | 35.78 | Central America |
| 2010s | 79.41 | 105.03 | 25.62 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rape or colza seed — gross production index number, Central America or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 128.48 against 35.29 in Central America as of 2017.
- What is the difference in rape or colza seed — gross production index number between Central America and Latvia?
- 93.19, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and Latvia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Central America and Latvia rank globally for rape or colza seed — gross production index number?
- Central America ranks 24th and Latvia ranks 21st of 24 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rape or colza seed — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.