Belgium-Luxembourg vs South Africa: Rape and Mustardseed — Stock Variation

Belgium-Luxembourg
1,500 t
in 1999
South Africa
637.17 t
in 2013
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
22nd
South Africa rank
24th

Rape and Mustardseed — Stock Variation over time

  • Belgium-Luxembourg
  • South Africa
-10.0k-5.0k05.0k196119872013

How they compare

Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 1,500 t against 637.17 t in South Africa, a difference of 862.83 t.

That makes Belgium-Luxembourg's figure about 2.4 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 24th of 74 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium-Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium-Luxembourg South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s -222.22 t 0 t 222.22 t South Africa
1970s 100 t 0 t 100 t Belgium-Luxembourg
1980s 100 t 0 t 100 t Belgium-Luxembourg
1990s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rape and mustardseed — stock variation, Belgium-Luxembourg or South Africa?
Belgium-Luxembourg, at 1,500 t against 637.17 t in South Africa as of 1999.
What is the difference in rape and mustardseed — stock variation between Belgium-Luxembourg and South Africa?
862.83 t, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and South Africa?
39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1999.
How do Belgium-Luxembourg and South Africa rank globally for rape and mustardseed — stock variation?
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 24th of 74 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rape and Mustardseed — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium-Luxembourg vs South Africa: Rape and Mustardseed — Stock Variation. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustardseed-stock-variation/belgium-luxembourg/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustardseed-stock-variation/belgium-luxembourg/south-africa/">Belgium-Luxembourg vs South Africa: Rape and Mustardseed — Stock Variation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rape and Mustardseed — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
108 places, 4,928 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.