Australia vs Central America: Rape and Mustardseed β€” Stock Variation

Australia
534,091 t
in 2013
Central America
107,573 t
in 2013
Australia rank
1st
Central America rank
3rd

Rape and Mustardseed β€” Stock Variation over time

  • Australia
  • Central America
-500.0k0500.0k1.0M196119872013

How they compare

Australia currently reports 534,091 t against 107,573 t in Central America, a difference of 426,518 t.

That makes Australia's figure about 5.0 times Central America's.

The two have swapped places 25 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Central America ahead.

Australia ranks 1st and Central America ranks 3rd of 74 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Central America in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Central America Difference Ahead
1960s -334.56 t 0 t 334.56 t Central America
1970s -5,075 t 0 t 5,075 t Central America
1980s -878.2 t -1,028 t 149.7 t Australia
1990s -116,687 t 660.8 t 117,348 t Central America
2000s 40,823 t -870.9 t 41,694 t Australia
2010s 157,168 t -1,736 t 158,904 t Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rape and mustardseed β€” stock variation, Australia or Central America?
Australia, at 534,091 t against 107,573 t in Central America as of 2013.
What is the difference in rape and mustardseed β€” stock variation between Australia and Central America?
426,518 t, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Central America?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Australia and Central America rank globally for rape and mustardseed β€” stock variation?
Australia ranks 1st and Central America ranks 3rd of 74 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rape and Mustardseed β€” Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Central America: Rape and Mustardseed β€” Stock Variation. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustardseed-stock-variation/australia/central-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustardseed-stock-variation/australia/central-america/">Australia vs Central America: Rape and Mustardseed β€” Stock Variation</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rape and Mustardseed β€” Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
108 places, 4,928 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.