Belarus vs United States of America: Rape and Mustardseed — Production

Belarus
675,546 t
in 2013
United States of America
1.02 million t
in 2013
Belarus rank
14th
United States of America rank
13th

Rape and Mustardseed — Production over time

  • Belarus
  • United States of America
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196119872013

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 1.02 million t against 675,546 t in Belarus, a difference of 344,664 t.

That makes United States of America's figure about 1.5 times Belarus's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 14th and United States of America ranks 13th of 71 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus United States of America Difference Ahead
1990s 31,125 t 341,503 t 310,378 t United States of America
2000s 205,628 t 737,320 t 531,691 t United States of America
2010s 533,439 t 989,908 t 456,469 t United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rape and mustardseed — production, Belarus or United States of America?
United States of America, at 1.02 million t against 675,546 t in Belarus as of 2013.
What is the difference in rape and mustardseed — production between Belarus and United States of America?
344,664 t, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and United States of America?
22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
How do Belarus and United States of America rank globally for rape and mustardseed — production?
Belarus ranks 14th and United States of America ranks 13th of 71 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rape and Mustardseed — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs United States of America: Rape and Mustardseed — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustardseed-production/belarus/united-states-of-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustardseed-production/belarus/united-states-of-america/">Belarus vs United States of America: Rape and Mustardseed — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rape and Mustardseed — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
100 places, 4,446 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.