French Polynesia vs Iceland: Rape and Mustardseed — Food supply quantity

French Polynesia
288.75 t
in 2013
Iceland
260 t
in 2013
French Polynesia rank
87th
Iceland rank
90th

Rape and Mustardseed — Food supply quantity over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Iceland
0100200300400196119872013

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 288.75 t against 260 t in Iceland, a difference of 28.75 t.

That makes French Polynesia's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 87th and Iceland ranks 90th of 154 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 25.97 t 25.97 t Iceland
1970s 0 t 48.75 t 48.75 t Iceland
1980s 0 t 122 t 122 t Iceland
1990s 203.12 t 198.5 t 4.62 t French Polynesia
2000s 311.62 t 307 t 4.62 t French Polynesia
2010s 303.12 t 313.44 t 10.31 t Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rape and mustardseed — food supply quantity, French Polynesia or Iceland?
French Polynesia, at 288.75 t against 260 t in Iceland as of 2013.
What is the difference in rape and mustardseed — food supply quantity between French Polynesia and Iceland?
28.75 t, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Iceland?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do French Polynesia and Iceland rank globally for rape and mustardseed — food supply quantity?
French Polynesia ranks 87th and Iceland ranks 90th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rape and Mustardseed — Food supply quantity (tonnes). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Iceland: Rape and Mustardseed — Food supply quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustardseed-food-supply-quantity-tonnes/french-polynesia/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustardseed-food-supply-quantity-tonnes/french-polynesia/iceland/">French Polynesia vs Iceland: Rape and Mustardseed — Food supply quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rape and Mustardseed — Food supply quantity (tonnes)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
194 places, 9,387 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.