Congo, Republic of vs Luxembourg: Rape and Mustardseed — Food supply quantity

Congo, Republic of
213.75 t
in 2013
Luxembourg
243.14 t
in 2013
Congo, Republic of rank
94th
Luxembourg rank
92nd

Rape and Mustardseed — Food supply quantity over time

  • Congo, Republic of
  • Luxembourg
0100200300196119872013

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 243.14 t against 213.75 t in Congo, Republic of, a difference of 29.39 t.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Congo, Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.

Congo, Republic of ranks 94th and Luxembourg ranks 92nd of 154 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Republic of Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 92.38 t 180.54 t 88.17 t Luxembourg
2010s 193.44 t 228.12 t 34.68 t Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rape and mustardseed — food supply quantity, Congo, Republic of or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 243.14 t against 213.75 t in Congo, Republic of as of 2013.
What is the difference in rape and mustardseed — food supply quantity between Congo, Republic of and Luxembourg?
29.39 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Republic of and Luxembourg?
14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2013.
How do Congo, Republic of and Luxembourg rank globally for rape and mustardseed — food supply quantity?
Congo, Republic of ranks 94th and Luxembourg ranks 92nd of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rape and Mustardseed — Food supply quantity (tonnes). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Republic of vs Luxembourg: Rape and Mustardseed — Food supply quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustardseed-food-supply-quantity-tonnes/congo-rep/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustardseed-food-supply-quantity-tonnes/congo-rep/luxembourg/">Congo, Republic of vs Luxembourg: Rape and Mustardseed — Food supply quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rape and Mustardseed — Food supply quantity (tonnes)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
194 places, 9,387 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.