China, Hong Kong SAR vs Finland: Rape and Mustardseed — Food supply

China, Hong Kong SAR
1,044 million Kcal
in 2023
Finland
1,131 million Kcal
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
92nd
Finland rank
89th

Rape and Mustardseed — Food supply over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Finland
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k201020162023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 1,131 million Kcal against 1,044 million Kcal in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 87 million Kcal.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 92nd and Finland ranks 89th of 192 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Finland Difference Ahead
2010s 1,950 million Kcal 1,947 million Kcal 2.99 million Kcal China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 1,179 million Kcal 525.05 million Kcal 654.31 million Kcal China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rape and mustardseed — food supply, China, Hong Kong SAR or Finland?
Finland, at 1,131 million Kcal against 1,044 million Kcal in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in rape and mustardseed — food supply between China, Hong Kong SAR and Finland?
87 million Kcal, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Finland?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Finland rank globally for rape and mustardseed — food supply?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 92nd and Finland ranks 89th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rape and Mustardseed — Food supply (kcal). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Finland: Rape and Mustardseed — Food supply. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustardseed-food-supply-kcal/china-hong-kong-sar/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustardseed-food-supply-kcal/china-hong-kong-sar/finland/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Finland: Rape and Mustardseed — Food supply</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rape and Mustardseed — Food supply (kcal)
Unit
million Kcal
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
222 places, 2,957 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.