Georgia vs Uganda: Rape and Mustardseed — Export Quantity
Rape and Mustardseed — Export Quantity over time
- Georgia
- Uganda
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 41 t against 30 t in Uganda, a difference of 11 t.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.4 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uganda ahead.
Georgia ranks 73rd and Uganda ranks 76th of 124 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t | 3.75 t | 3.75 t | Uganda |
| 2000s | 1.88 t | 6.3 t | 4.42 t | Uganda |
| 2010s | 597 t | 20 t | 577 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rape and mustardseed — export quantity, Georgia or Uganda?
- Georgia, at 41 t against 30 t in Uganda as of 2013.
- What is the difference in rape and mustardseed — export quantity between Georgia and Uganda?
- 11 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Uganda?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
- How do Georgia and Uganda rank globally for rape and mustardseed — export quantity?
- Georgia ranks 73rd and Uganda ranks 76th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rape and Mustardseed — Export Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.