Bahamas vs Iraq: Pumpkins, squash and gourds — Production, per unit of GDP
Bahamas
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Iraq
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Bahamas rank
67th
Iraq rank
65th
Pumpkins, squash and gourds — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Bahamas
- Iraq
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Bahamas, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Iraq's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Iraq ahead.
Bahamas ranks 67th and Iraq ranks 65th of 108 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Iraq in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Iraq |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pumpkins, squash and gourds — production, per unit of gdp, Bahamas or Iraq?
- Iraq, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Bahamas as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pumpkins, squash and gourds — production, per unit of gdp between Bahamas and Iraq?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Iraq?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Bahamas and Iraq rank globally for pumpkins, squash and gourds — production, per unit of gdp?
- Bahamas ranks 67th and Iraq ranks 65th of 108 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Pumpkins, squash and gourds — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Pumpkins, squash and gourds — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.