Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Pumpkins, squash and gourds — Production, per capita
Rwanda
0.0189 t per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.0162 t per person
in 2024
Rwanda rank
10th
Zimbabwe rank
12th
Pumpkins, squash and gourds — Production, per capita over time
- Rwanda
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.0189 t per person against 0.0162 t per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0027 t per person.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 109 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0206 t per person | 0.0118 t per person | 0.0088 t per person | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0.0197 t per person | 0.017 t per person | 0.0027 t per person | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pumpkins, squash and gourds — production, per capita, Rwanda or Zimbabwe?
- Rwanda, at 0.0189 t per person against 0.0162 t per person in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pumpkins, squash and gourds — production, per capita between Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0027 t per person, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Zimbabwe rank globally for pumpkins, squash and gourds — production, per capita?
- Rwanda ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 109 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Pumpkins, squash and gourds — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Pumpkins, squash and gourds — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.