Afghanistan vs Malawi: Pulses, Total — Yield, per unit of GDP
Afghanistan
0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malawi
0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
29th
Malawi rank
32nd
Pulses, Total — Yield, per unit of GDP over time
- Afghanistan
- Malawi
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP against 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in Malawi, a difference of 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 29th and Malawi ranks 32nd of 151 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pulses, total — yield, per unit of gdp, Afghanistan or Malawi?
- Afghanistan, at 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP against 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pulses, total — yield, per unit of gdp between Afghanistan and Malawi?
- 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Malawi?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Malawi rank globally for pulses, total — yield, per unit of gdp?
- Afghanistan ranks 29th and Malawi ranks 32nd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Pulses, Total — Yield, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Pulses, Total — Yield divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.