South Sudan vs South Sudan: Pulses, Total — Area harvested
Pulses, Total — Area harvested over time
- South Sudan
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 38,777 ha against 38,777 ha in South Sudan, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 13 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
South Sudan ranks 116th and South Sudan ranks 116th of 223 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 36,666 ha | 36,666 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 38,469 ha | 38,469 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pulses, total — area harvested, South Sudan or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 38,777 ha against 38,777 ha in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pulses, total — area harvested between South Sudan and South Sudan?
- 0 ha, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do South Sudan and South Sudan rank globally for pulses, total — area harvested?
- South Sudan ranks 116th and South Sudan ranks 116th of 223 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pulses, Total — Area harvested. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.