Cuba vs South Sudan: Pulses, Total — Area harvested
Pulses, Total — Area harvested over time
- Cuba
- South Sudan
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 40,030 ha against 38,777 ha in South Sudan, a difference of 1,253 ha.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 114th and South Sudan ranks 116th of 223 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 119,898 ha | 36,666 ha | 83,232 ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 59,514 ha | 38,469 ha | 21,045 ha | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pulses, total — area harvested, Cuba or South Sudan?
- Cuba, at 40,030 ha against 38,777 ha in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in pulses, total — area harvested between Cuba and South Sudan?
- 1,253 ha, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and South Sudan rank globally for pulses, total — area harvested?
- Cuba ranks 114th and South Sudan ranks 116th of 223 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pulses, Total — Area harvested. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.