Northern America vs Romania: Pulses — Stock Variation
Pulses — Stock Variation over time
- Northern America
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 38 1000 t against -719 1000 t in Northern America, a difference of 757 1000 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Northern America ahead.
Northern America ranks 28th and Romania ranks 12th of 29 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Northern America averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern America | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 205.3 1000 t | 5.4 1000 t | 199.9 1000 t | Northern America |
| 2020s | -700 1000 t | 27.25 1000 t | 727.25 1000 t | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pulses — stock variation, Northern America or Romania?
- Romania, at 38 1000 t against -719 1000 t in Northern America as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pulses — stock variation between Northern America and Romania?
- 757 1000 t, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern America and Romania?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Northern America and Romania rank globally for pulses — stock variation?
- Northern America ranks 28th and Romania ranks 12th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pulses — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.