Belarus vs Indonesia: Pulses — Stock Variation
Pulses — Stock Variation over time
- Belarus
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports -2 1000 t against -3 1000 t in Belarus, a difference of 1 1000 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 156th and Indonesia ranks 154th of 182 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Indonesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.2 1000 t | 2.3 1000 t | 2.5 1000 t | Indonesia |
| 2020s | -1.5 1000 t | -2.5 1000 t | 1 1000 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pulses — stock variation, Belarus or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at -2 1000 t against -3 1000 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pulses — stock variation between Belarus and Indonesia?
- 1 1000 t, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Indonesia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Indonesia rank globally for pulses — stock variation?
- Belarus ranks 156th and Indonesia ranks 154th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pulses — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.