China vs Equatorial Guinea: Primary Forest Loss

China
3,213
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
2,522
in 2025
China rank
44th
Equatorial Guinea rank
45th

Primary Forest Loss over time

  • China
  • Equatorial Guinea
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k200220132025

How they compare

China currently reports 3,213 against 2,522 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 691.

That makes China's figure about 1.3 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was China ahead.

China ranks 44th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 45th of 80 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 4,198 1,368 2,830 China
2010s 4,132 4,783 651 Equatorial Guinea
2020s 1,936 3,307 1,371 Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary forest loss, China or Equatorial Guinea?
China, at 3,213 against 2,522 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in primary forest loss between China and Equatorial Guinea?
691, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Equatorial Guinea?
24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
How do China and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for primary forest loss?
China ranks 44th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 45th of 80 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Primary Forest Loss. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Primary Forest Loss
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
80 places, 1,920 data points, 2002–2025
Last refreshed