Australia vs Maldives: Primary Forest Loss
Australia
0
in 2025
Maldives
1
in 2025
Australia rank
75th
Maldives rank
73rd
Primary Forest Loss over time
- Australia
- Maldives
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 1 against 0 in Australia, a difference of 1.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 75th and Maldives ranks 73rd of 80 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.62 | 0.625 | 3 | Australia |
| 2010s | 4.2 | 0.7 | 3.5 | Australia |
| 2020s | 1.17 | 1 | 0.1667 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary forest loss, Australia or Maldives?
- Maldives, at 1 against 0 in Australia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary forest loss between Australia and Maldives?
- 1, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Maldives?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Maldives rank globally for primary forest loss?
- Australia ranks 75th and Maldives ranks 73rd of 80 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Primary Forest Loss. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.