China vs Montenegro: Prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — Value over time
- China
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 3 % against 2.9 % in China, a difference of 0.1 %.
Across all 6 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
China ranks 94th and Montenegro ranks 91st of 116 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — value, China or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 3 % against 2.9 % in China as of 2005.
- What is the difference in prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — value between China and Montenegro?
- 0.1 %, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Montenegro?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2005.
- How do China and Montenegro rank globally for prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — value?
- China ranks 94th and Montenegro ranks 91st of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.