Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the male adult population

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
14.1 %
in 2023
Zimbabwe
20.8 %
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
10th
Zimbabwe rank
12th

Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the male adult population over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Zimbabwe
0102030201420182023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 20.8 % against 14.1 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 6.7 %.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.5 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 37 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 14.45 % 29.42 % 14.97 % Zimbabwe
2020s 15.22 % 21.5 % 6.28 % Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of severe food insecurity in the male adult population, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 20.8 % against 14.1 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of severe food insecurity in the male adult population between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Zimbabwe?
6.7 %, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Zimbabwe?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Zimbabwe rank globally for prevalence of severe food insecurity in the male adult population?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the male adult population (percent) (3-year average) — Confidence interval: Lower bound. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the male adult population. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-severe-food-insecurity-in-the-male-adult-population-percent-3-year-average-2/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-severe-food-insecurity-in-the-male-adult-population-percent-3-year-average-2/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/zimbabwe/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the male adult population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the male adult population (percent) (3-year average) — Confidence interval: Lower bound
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
152 places, 1,348 data points, 2014–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.