Nauru vs Tonga: Prevalence of obesity in the adult population (18 years and older)
Prevalence of obesity in the adult population (18 years and older) over time
- Nauru
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 73.8 % against 71.4 % in Nauru, a difference of 2.4 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nauru ahead.
Nauru ranks 4th and Tonga ranks 2nd of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 2 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.23 % | 57.32 % | 8.91 % | Nauru |
| 2010s | 68.48 % | 65.3 % | 3.18 % | Nauru |
| 2020s | 70.74 % | 72.04 % | 1.3 % | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of obesity in the adult population (18 years and older), Nauru or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 73.8 % against 71.4 % in Nauru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in prevalence of obesity in the adult population (18 years and older) between Nauru and Tonga?
- 2.4 %, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Tonga?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Nauru and Tonga rank globally for prevalence of obesity in the adult population (18 years and older)?
- Nauru ranks 4th and Tonga ranks 2nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of obesity in the adult population (18 years and older) (percent) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.