Cabo Verde vs Guinea-Bissau: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult

Cabo Verde
32.1 %
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
62.5 %
in 2021
Cabo Verde rank
17th
Guinea-Bissau rank
16th

Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • Guinea-Bissau
0204060201620192023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 62.5 % against 32.1 % in Cabo Verde, a difference of 30.4 %.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.9 times Cabo Verde's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Cabo Verde ranks 17th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 16th of 37 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
2010s 36.15 % 61.95 % 25.8 % Guinea-Bissau
2020s 34.55 % 62.45 % 27.9 % Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult, Cabo Verde or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 62.5 % against 32.1 % in Cabo Verde as of 2021.
What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult between Cabo Verde and Guinea-Bissau?
30.4 %, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Guinea-Bissau?
6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
How do Cabo Verde and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult?
Cabo Verde ranks 17th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 16th of 37 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult population (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cabo Verde vs Guinea-Bissau: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-moderate-or-severe-food-insecurity-in-the-female-adult-population-percent-3/cabo-verde-2/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-moderate-or-severe-food-insecurity-in-the-female-adult-population-percent-3/cabo-verde-2/guinea-bissau/">Cabo Verde vs Guinea-Bissau: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult population (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
169 places, 1,581 data points, 2014–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.