Burkina Faso vs Cambodia: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult

Burkina Faso
39.6 %
in 2023
Cambodia
36.1 %
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
36th
Cambodia rank
38th

Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Cambodia
010203040201420182023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 39.6 % against 36.1 % in Cambodia, a difference of 3.5 %.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Cambodia ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 36th and Cambodia ranks 38th of 120 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Cambodia Difference Ahead
2010s 34.55 % 38.35 % 3.8 % Cambodia
2020s 37.73 % 40.58 % 2.85 % Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult, Burkina Faso or Cambodia?
Burkina Faso, at 39.6 % against 36.1 % in Cambodia as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult between Burkina Faso and Cambodia?
3.5 %, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Cambodia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Cambodia rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult?
Burkina Faso ranks 36th and Cambodia ranks 38th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult population (percent) (3-year average) — Confidence interval: Lower bound. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Cambodia: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-moderate-or-severe-food-insecurity-in-the-female-adult-population-percent-3-2/burkina-faso/cambodia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-moderate-or-severe-food-insecurity-in-the-female-adult-population-percent-3-2/burkina-faso/cambodia/">Burkina Faso vs Cambodia: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult population (percent) (3-year average) — Confidence interval: Lower bound
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
168 places, 1,574 data points, 2014–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.