Iceland vs Luxembourg: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)
Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) over time
- Iceland
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 15.4 % against 14.7 % in Iceland, a difference of 0.7 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 162nd and Luxembourg ranks 159th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.96 % | 10.86 % | 0.1 % | Iceland |
| 2010s | 11.68 % | 12.16 % | 0.48 % | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 13.88 % | 14.62 % | 0.75 % | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years), Iceland or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 15.4 % against 14.7 % in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) between Iceland and Luxembourg?
- 0.7 %, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Luxembourg rank globally for prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)?
- Iceland ranks 162nd and Luxembourg ranks 159th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.