Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)

Equatorial Guinea
41.3 %
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
39.7 %
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
25th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
26th

Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0204060200020112023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 41.3 % against 39.7 % in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 1.6 %.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 25th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 26th of 177 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 47.69 % 46.45 % 1.24 % Equatorial Guinea
2010s 42.36 % 40.57 % 1.79 % Equatorial Guinea
2020s 41.15 % 39.42 % 1.73 % Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years), Equatorial Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
Equatorial Guinea, at 41.3 % against 39.7 % in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) between Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
1.6 %, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 25th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 26th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anemia-among-women-of-reproductive-age-15-49-years-percent-value/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anemia-among-women-of-reproductive-age-15-49-years-percent-value/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
234 places, 5,616 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.