Dominican Republic vs Suriname: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)
Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Suriname
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 22.4 % against 22.2 % in Suriname, a difference of 0.2 %.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Suriname ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 110th and Suriname ranks 112th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.68 % | 23.72 % | 0.04 % | Suriname |
| 2010s | 19.62 % | 19.48 % | 0.14 % | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 21.52 % | 21.27 % | 0.25 % | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years), Dominican Republic or Suriname?
- Dominican Republic, at 22.4 % against 22.2 % in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) between Dominican Republic and Suriname?
- 0.2 %, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Suriname?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and Suriname rank globally for prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 110th and Suriname ranks 112th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.