Côte d'Ivoire vs Southern Asia: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)
Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Southern Asia
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 51.4 % against 49.3 % in Southern Asia, a difference of 2.1 %.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Côte d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Southern Asia ranks 2nd of 37 countries.
Côte d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Southern Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.23 % | 45.39 % | 7.84 % | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 49.87 % | 46.57 % | 3.3 % | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2020s | 50.62 % | 48.62 % | 2 % | Côte d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years), Côte d'Ivoire or Southern Asia?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 51.4 % against 49.3 % in Southern Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) between Côte d'Ivoire and Southern Asia?
- 2.1 %, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Southern Asia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Southern Asia rank globally for prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Southern Asia ranks 2nd of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.