Mongolia vs Zambia: Potatoes: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Mongolia
0.0598 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0623 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia rank
106th
Zambia rank
105th

Potatoes: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • Mongolia
  • Zambia
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0623 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0598 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0025 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mongolia ahead.

Mongolia ranks 106th and Zambia ranks 105th of 115 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.007 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0024 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0046 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
1970s 0.0118 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0032 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0086 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
1980s 0.0346 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0056 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.029 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
1990s 0.044 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0086 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0354 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
2000s 0.0395 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0142 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0254 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
2010s 0.0594 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0279 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0316 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
2020s 0.0684 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0622 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0062 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Mongolia or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0623 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0598 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mongolia as of 2023.
What is the difference in potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Mongolia and Zambia?
0.0025 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mongolia and Zambia rank globally for potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Mongolia ranks 106th and Zambia ranks 105th of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Zambia: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/mongolia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/mongolia/zambia/">Mongolia vs Zambia: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
116 places, 6,014 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.