Congo vs Mongolia: Potatoes: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Congo
0.0427 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia
0.0598 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
108th
Mongolia rank
106th

Potatoes: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • Congo
  • Mongolia
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0.0598 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0427 1000 USD per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0171 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.4 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mongolia ahead.

Congo ranks 108th and Mongolia ranks 106th of 115 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Mongolia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0056 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.007 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0014 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
1970s 0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0118 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
1980s 0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0346 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0246 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
1990s 0.0172 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0221 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0049 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
2000s 0.0266 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0307 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0042 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
2010s 0.0383 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0594 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0211 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
2020s 0.0427 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0684 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0257 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Congo or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 0.0598 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0427 1000 USD per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Congo and Mongolia?
0.0171 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mongolia?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Mongolia rank globally for potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Congo ranks 108th and Mongolia ranks 106th of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Mongolia: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mongolia/">Congo vs Mongolia: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
116 places, 6,014 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.