Chile vs Mozambique: Potatoes: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Chile
0.5003 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
0.513 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
67th
Mozambique rank
65th

Potatoes: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • Chile
  • Mozambique
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 0.513 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.5003 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0127 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 67th and Mozambique ranks 65th of 115 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4489 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0185 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4304 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.4651 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0354 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4297 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.5163 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.053 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4633 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.5407 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0696 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.471 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.6504 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0915 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5589 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.7104 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2401 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4704 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.6157 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4807 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1351 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Chile or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 0.513 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.5003 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Chile and Mozambique?
0.0127 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mozambique?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Mozambique rank globally for potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Chile ranks 67th and Mozambique ranks 65th of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mozambique: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/mozambique/">Chile vs Mozambique: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
116 places, 6,014 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.