Chad vs Mongolia: Potatoes: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Chad
0.0181 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia
0.0598 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
109th
Mongolia rank
106th

Potatoes: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • Chad
  • Mongolia
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0.0598 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0181 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.0417 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 3.3 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mongolia ahead.

Chad ranks 109th and Mongolia ranks 106th of 115 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Mongolia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0052 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.007 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
1970s 0.0061 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0118 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0057 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
1980s 0.0074 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0346 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0271 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
1990s 0.0113 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0327 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0214 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
2000s 0.021 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0307 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0098 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
2010s 0.0207 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0594 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0387 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
2020s 0.0187 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0684 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0497 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Chad or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 0.0598 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0181 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Chad and Mongolia?
0.0417 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Mongolia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Mongolia rank globally for potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Chad ranks 109th and Mongolia ranks 106th of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Mongolia: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/mongolia/">Chad vs Mongolia: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
116 places, 6,014 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.