Australia vs Iceland: Potatoes: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Australia
0.0774 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.0657 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
101st
Iceland rank
104th

Potatoes: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • Australia
  • Iceland
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0774 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0657 1000 USD per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0117 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Australia ranks 101st and Iceland ranks 104th of 115 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0326 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0735 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0409 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 0.0395 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0768 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0373 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.0509 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1183 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0674 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.0646 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0928 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0282 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.0674 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1015 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0341 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.0632 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0777 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0144 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0.0722 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0635 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0087 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Australia or Iceland?
Australia, at 0.0774 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0657 1000 USD per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Australia and Iceland?
0.0117 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Iceland rank globally for potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Australia ranks 101st and Iceland ranks 104th of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Iceland: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/iceland/">Australia vs Iceland: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
116 places, 6,014 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.