Tunisia vs Uganda: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Tunisia
0.7054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
0.5904 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia rank
55th
Uganda rank
58th

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Tunisia
  • Uganda
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.7054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5904 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0.115 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.2 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.

Tunisia ranks 55th and Uganda ranks 58th of 137 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Tunisia averaged higher in 3 and Uganda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tunisia Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0916 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1531 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0614 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uganda
1970s 0.1479 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2596 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uganda
1980s 0.2444 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2213 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 0.3981 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4192 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0212 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uganda
2000s 0.5382 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6055 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0673 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uganda
2010s 0.6468 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2645 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3823 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 0.6999 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4841 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2158 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Tunisia or Uganda?
Tunisia, at 0.7054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5904 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Tunisia and Uganda?
0.115 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Tunisia and Uganda rank globally for potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Tunisia ranks 55th and Uganda ranks 58th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tunisia vs Uganda: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/tunisia/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/tunisia/uganda/">Tunisia vs Uganda: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
138 places, 7,189 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.