Morocco vs Peru: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Morocco
1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco rank
47th
Peru rank
46th

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Morocco
  • Peru
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Morocco, a difference of 0.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.

Morocco ranks 47th and Peru ranks 46th of 137 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 4 and Peru in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1239 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2903 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1664 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru
1970s 0.1734 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3394 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru
1980s 0.3809 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3237 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0572 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
1990s 0.5817 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3842 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1975 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
2000s 0.7693 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6394 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1298 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
2010s 1.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9196 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1056 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
2020s 0.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1407 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Morocco or Peru?
Peru, at 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Morocco as of 2023.
What is the difference in potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Morocco and Peru?
0.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Peru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Morocco and Peru rank globally for potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Morocco ranks 47th and Peru ranks 46th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Morocco vs Peru: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/morocco/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/morocco/peru/">Morocco vs Peru: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
138 places, 7,189 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.