Mongolia vs Zambia: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Mongolia
0.0288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0219 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia rank
119th
Zambia rank
121st

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Mongolia
  • Zambia
00.010.020.030.04196119922023

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0.0288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0219 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0069 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.3 times Zambia's.

Across all 49 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 119th and Zambia ranks 121st of 137 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0025 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mongolia
1970s 0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mongolia
1980s 0.0167 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0147 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mongolia
1990s 0.0212 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0182 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mongolia
2000s 0.019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0141 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mongolia
2010s 0.0286 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0188 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mongolia
2020s 0.0329 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0219 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Mongolia or Zambia?
Mongolia, at 0.0288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0219 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Mongolia and Zambia?
0.0069 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mongolia and Zambia rank globally for potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Mongolia ranks 119th and Zambia ranks 121st of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Zambia: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/mongolia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/mongolia/zambia/">Mongolia vs Zambia: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
138 places, 7,189 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.