Ecuador vs Mexico: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Ecuador
0.2641 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
0.2557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
80th
Mexico rank
81st

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Mexico
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.2641 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 80th and Mexico ranks 81st of 137 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3299 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0497 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2802 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.4295 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0877 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3418 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.3346 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.124 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.4407 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1627 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.333 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2058 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1271 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.3547 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2177 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.137 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.2939 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2497 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0442 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Ecuador or Mexico?
Ecuador, at 0.2641 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Ecuador and Mexico?
0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Mexico rank globally for potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Ecuador ranks 80th and Mexico ranks 81st of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Mexico: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/mexico/">Ecuador vs Mexico: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
138 places, 7,189 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.