Ecuador vs Jamaica: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Ecuador
0.2641 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
0.3074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
80th
Jamaica rank
77th

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Jamaica
0.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 0.3074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2641 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0433 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 80th and Jamaica ranks 77th of 137 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Jamaica in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3299 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2304 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0994 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.4295 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2618 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1677 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.3346 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.4407 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.254 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1866 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.333 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1575 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1755 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.3547 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3772 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0225 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 0.2939 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3663 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0724 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Ecuador or Jamaica?
Jamaica, at 0.3074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2641 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Ecuador and Jamaica?
0.0433 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Jamaica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Jamaica rank globally for potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Ecuador ranks 80th and Jamaica ranks 77th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Jamaica: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/jamaica/">Ecuador vs Jamaica: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
138 places, 7,189 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.