China vs Pakistan: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

China
2.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
2.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
24th
Pakistan rank
22nd

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • China
  • Pakistan
0123196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 2.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China ahead.

China ranks 24th and Pakistan ranks 22nd of 137 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4202 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0508 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3694 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
1970s 0.6613 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0895 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5719 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
1980s 0.7296 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1724 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5571 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
1990s 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3506 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8947 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2000s 1.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6754 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2010s 2.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2020s 2.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.321 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), China or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 2.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between China and Pakistan?
0.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Pakistan rank globally for potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
China ranks 24th and Pakistan ranks 22nd of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Pakistan: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/pakistan/">China vs Pakistan: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
138 places, 7,189 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.