Chile vs Jamaica: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Chile
0.2841 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
0.3074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
78th
Jamaica rank
77th

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Chile
  • Jamaica
0.10.20.30.40.50.6196119922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 0.3074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2841 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0233 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 78th and Jamaica ranks 77th of 137 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 6 and Jamaica in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2549 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2304 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0244 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.264 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2618 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.2931 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0885 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.307 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.254 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.3693 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1575 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2118 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.4033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3772 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.3496 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3663 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0167 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Chile or Jamaica?
Jamaica, at 0.3074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2841 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Chile and Jamaica?
0.0233 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Jamaica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Jamaica rank globally for potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Chile ranks 78th and Jamaica ranks 77th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Jamaica: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/jamaica/">Chile vs Jamaica: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
138 places, 7,189 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.