Chile vs Ecuador: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Chile
0.2841 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
0.2641 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
78th
Ecuador rank
80th

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Chile
  • Ecuador
0.20.30.40.50.6196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.2841 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2641 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 78th and Ecuador ranks 80th of 137 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Ecuador in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2549 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3299 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.264 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4295 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1655 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.2931 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3346 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0415 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.307 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4407 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1337 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.3693 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.333 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0363 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.4033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3547 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0487 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.3496 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2939 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Chile or Ecuador?
Chile, at 0.2841 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2641 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Chile and Ecuador?
0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Ecuador rank globally for potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Chile ranks 78th and Ecuador ranks 80th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Ecuador: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/ecuador/">Chile vs Ecuador: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
138 places, 7,189 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.