Brazil vs Iraq: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Brazil
0.1254 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iraq
0.1321 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
99th
Iraq rank
97th

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Brazil
  • Iraq
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 0.1321 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1254 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.0067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Iraq's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 99th and Iraq ranks 97th of 137 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Iraq in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Iraq Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0393 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0332 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
1970s 0.052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 0.0615 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0761 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0146 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
1990s 0.0756 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2467 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1711 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
2000s 0.0948 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3628 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.268 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
2010s 0.1116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2061 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0946 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
2020s 0.1177 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2364 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1188 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Brazil or Iraq?
Iraq, at 0.1321 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1254 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Brazil and Iraq?
0.0067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Iraq?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Iraq rank globally for potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Brazil ranks 99th and Iraq ranks 97th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Iraq: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/brazil/iraq/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/brazil/iraq/">Brazil vs Iraq: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
138 places, 7,189 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.