Brazil vs Eswatini: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Brazil
0.1254 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0.1252 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
99th
Eswatini rank
100th

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Brazil
  • Eswatini
0.0250.050.0750.10.125196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.1254 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1252 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 99th and Eswatini ranks 100th of 137 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0393 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0268 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
1970s 0.052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0843 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0322 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.0615 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0902 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0287 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.0756 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0878 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0122 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.0948 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0938 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 0.1116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0055 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0.1177 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1252 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Brazil or Eswatini?
Brazil, at 0.1254 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1252 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Brazil and Eswatini?
0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Eswatini rank globally for potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Brazil ranks 99th and Eswatini ranks 100th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Eswatini: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/brazil/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/brazil/eswatini/">Brazil vs Eswatini: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
138 places, 7,189 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.