Bhutan vs Ecuador: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Bhutan
0.2477 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
0.2641 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
83rd
Ecuador rank
80th

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Ecuador
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.2641 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2477 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0164 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Bhutan ranks 83rd and Ecuador ranks 80th of 137 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0881 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3299 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2418 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.1138 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4295 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3157 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.1593 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3346 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1753 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.1697 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4407 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.271 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.2933 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.333 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0396 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.3148 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3547 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0399 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.2509 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2939 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0429 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Bhutan or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 0.2641 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2477 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Bhutan and Ecuador?
0.0164 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Ecuador rank globally for potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Bhutan ranks 83rd and Ecuador ranks 80th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Ecuador: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/ecuador/">Bhutan vs Ecuador: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
138 places, 7,189 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.