Argentina vs Cuba: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Argentina
0.1963 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba
0.1925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
85th
Cuba rank
86th

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Argentina
  • Cuba
0.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 0.1963 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Argentina ranks 85th and Cuba ranks 86th of 137 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Cuba in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Cuba Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1654 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2259 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0605 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0.158 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2794 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1215 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0.1934 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6218 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4284 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0.2134 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6187 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.1886 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.679 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4904 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0.2103 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0947 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.2352 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2323 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Argentina or Cuba?
Argentina, at 0.1963 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Argentina and Cuba?
0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Cuba?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Cuba rank globally for potatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Argentina ranks 85th and Cuba ranks 86th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Cuba: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/argentina/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/argentina/cuba/">Argentina vs Cuba: Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
138 places, 7,189 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Potatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.