Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Pistachios, in shell — Gross Production Index Number

Australia and New Zealand
277.84
in 2024
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
145.18
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
1st
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
3rd

Pistachios, in shell — Gross Production Index Number over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
50100150200250300197620002024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 277.84 against 145.18 in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 132.66.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.9 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 1st and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 3rd of 19 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
2000s 60.88 53.81 7.07 Australia and New Zealand
2010s 98.76 100.14 1.37 Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 172.79 143.38 29.41 Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pistachios, in shell — gross production index number, Australia and New Zealand or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Australia and New Zealand, at 277.84 against 145.18 in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in pistachios, in shell — gross production index number between Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
132.66, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for pistachios, in shell — gross production index number?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 1st and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 3rd of 19 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pistachios, in shell — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Pistachios, in shell — Gross Production Index Number. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/pistachios-in-shell-gross-production-index-number-2014-2016-100/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/pistachios-in-shell-gross-production-index-number-2014-2016-100/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Pistachios, in shell — Gross Production Index Number</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pistachios, in shell — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
44 places, 2,073 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.